By Sgt. 1st Class
Kathleen T. Rhem, USA
American Forces Press Service
WASHINGTON, Feb. 26, 2002
– Defense officials expect
to
announce within a month what
shape the new Anthrax Vaccine
Immunization Program will take.
In 1998, the department began
an aggressive program to
vaccinate all service members
against the disease – a
potential biological warfare
agent. The vaccination program
came under public criticism
because of some service
members' fears about the vaccine's
safety.
Critics became more vocal when
Defense officials scaled
back the program several times
due to vaccine shortages.
Bioport, the sole manufacturer
of the vaccine, worked with
the FDA for over three years
to gain approval of its
renovated facilities as supplies
of FDA-released anthrax
vaccine dwindled.
Bioport received final FDA approval
in January to resume
production and distribute more
vaccine. Defense Department
officials are now looking at
how or even whether to
continue the previous program
of full vaccination of all
service members.
"We've undergone a very thorough
process over the last
several weeks looking at options
and have discussed those
with people both on the military
medical side as well as
the non-medical side (and) civilian
leadership, and we will
soon be making some announcements,"
Dr. Bill Winkenwerder
said.
Winkenwerder is the assistant
secretary of defense for
health affairs. He said he understands
the concerns service
members have and wants to allay
any fears among the troops
and the American public.
Military medical officials have
asked the Armed Forces
Epidemiological Board and the
Institute of Medicine to
conduct a scientific review
of the safety of the vaccine
and report back to the department.
Winkenwerder said he
expects those reports to be
"available in the near future."
DoD is working with the Centers
for Disease Control and
Prevention in Atlanta on clinical
studies into how the
vaccine is administered. Currently,
the FDA-approved
regimen is six shots over 18
months.
DoD officials would like to find
out if that could be
reduced to five or even four
shots over a shorter period of
time, said Army Col. Randy Randolph,
director of the
Anthrax Vaccine Immunization
Program Agency. Randolph said
the CDC is ready to begin enrolling
volunteers for clinical
studies designed to determine
if the number of doses can be
reduced while maintaining the
same level of immunity. Any
change will require FDA approval.
The study will also look at the
method of administering the
vaccine to see if it's possible
to reduce the injection-
site reactions currently reported.
The most common side
effect associated with the anthrax
vaccine is a localized,
minor reaction at the site of
injection. Randolph said
roughly 30 percent of men and
60 percent of women report
minor reactions less than an
inch in size.
More serious reactions are rare,
he said. Less than one
percent of men and women receiving
the vaccine report a
local reaction of larger than
five inches.
Today the only FDA-approved method
of injecting the vaccine
is to do so subcutaneously,
meaning it is injected just
below the skin. A pilot study
indicated injecting the
vaccine into muscle tissue,
called intramuscularly, might
reduce such reactions tenfold,
Randolph said.
Local reactions are not dangerous,
but Randolph said they
are still worth trying to reduce.
"No one likes swelling,
and no one likes pain and redness,"
he said.
Winkenwerder said DoD began vaccinating
troops "in response
to a perceived threat of anthrax
being used as a biological
terror agent." Anthrax-laced
mail delivered to various
government and media offices
in October 2001 show those
concerns to have been well-founded.
Whatever form the military vaccination
program takes now,
Winkenwerder said he is confident
this vaccine works and is
safe. "Our primary concern is
the safety and the health of
… the service men and women
and their families," he said.
"On the basis of the FDA's review
and the basis of very
extensive work we've done and
others outside of DoD have
done to look at the safety and
effectiveness (of the
anthrax vaccine), we believe
-- and I personally believe --
that this is a safe and effective
vaccine."
_______________________________________________________